In single line, can I call Obama’s new approach as a creating a new leader for the Muslim world. We all know that all the religious groups started looking at the Muslim community with suspicion due to some or the other deeds by various sectarian Muslim groups. Those groups tried to portray themselves as the custodians of the whole of Muslim world. Started with an issue between Palestine and Israel it had spread over continents into the minds of each and every individual. For this they used similar existing conflicts. For example, Kashmir which was an issue between two countries was blown out of proportion to an issue between Hindus and Muslims. When India houses more Muslims than Pakistan. How can it be possible when US attack on Iraq for oil was made into an attack on Muslims by Christians. US would have attacked any other country irrespective of Muslim or Christian population for that matter since petroleum was the focus but unfortunately at that point of time it was Saddam. For each of these actions the terrorist groups were able to agitate part of the Muslim population. These terrorists responded with similar attacks on the governments and people of other countries
With all this people started looking at the Muslim population with suspicion. Why did it happen?. The reason may not be simple. The rise of so many sectarian terrorist groups from one of the poorest parts of Asia with highest concentration Muslims may be due to the accumulated frustration in their minds against the rise of other communities or nations. It’s totally natural for a group to get annoyed by the rise of other groups, it is just a human nature and that is the same that might have happened here also but the so called educated western world orfor that matter even the eastern worlds didn’t notice the rising frustration in their backyard. Instead of providing a helping hand to our own brothers we tried to alienate them and pushed them out of the mainstream. For that matter India tried to provide a helping hand by giving more reservations and aids to the muslim communities and Madrasas but we also irritated them in ayodhya and godra which these terrorists groups used as oil to the fire. These sectarian terrorist groups exploited the common man with their complicated ideologies. The muslim population lost direction, whether the path of peace or path of war can bring them prosperity. Various incidents proved that what currently exists is a world with so many leaders of which none of them can provide a proper guidance to the Muslims none of them can claim that they are the true representatives.In such a situation only way out is to create a true representative. But how, it is tough especially in a world with so many people with so many different ideas.
Hope Obama can become the voice of the Muslims being a half Muslim and a half Christian he is the best candidate for the post and also his American African origin blend the rich and the poor too.
Speak for the muslims and be their leader since you are already the leader of the other half (I hope),.........
1 comment:
We cant exactly say that the frustration alone did this work. What about the rich middle east, turkey where muslims are more progressive? There are other nations as well which have secular background and which are reeling under bad economy. But the muslims turning to attacks were just because of some vested elements who in the name of this under development , make it on to other other nations and create incite in unemployed people by interlacing elements from islams fundamental principles. Now if u take the many terrorist leaders arrested or killed are very knowledgeable people.
Their motive is entirely different and sprung from the ideology that the entire world should be muslim world. To strenghthen that ideology they use many factors ranging from under employment , suppression , underdevelopment and oppression.
if the same principle is applied , the for christians who were suppressed in orissa , others should have taken arms..but thats not the case always.
A belligerent war started some where wa taken up by different nations for their personal benefit , eg afghan vs russia, palestine vs israel, bosnian war, kosovo war ..all were taken up and when a common element called muslims were there the vested elements just flared it up.
muslims may be underdeveloped and this because of their own medieval policies and principles. if they want development they should change. The problem actually is that some elements want of power and establishment of draconian rules and never admit failure and blame others for their own mistakes. This is very much explained in current swat war in pak where muslims fight themselves and also the taliban onslaught in afghan. The frustration u talk is artificially created by these elements by depriving the citizens wit the much needed development and education.
If they were underdeveloped , how do u think the militants use the most advanced weapons and communication systems? Why the dark elements overlook the economic situation of a poor state but provide millions of dollars in aid for militants,of which atmost half of the money is what it would have required to build that states economy??
So the conclusion is its a war for power and all the other reasons are fabricated ones.
Post a Comment